Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Don Giannatti's avatar

Yes, I still shoot film.

I do not do it because I think it is superior, or that I think an image shot on film is automatically any better than a digital image. I shoot it because it has a slower process baked in. With my Fuji 680, the shooting is slow and cumbersomd, and the film is expensive at 10 shots per roll. This deliberate approach to making my images helps me to understand the process of making an image. I've been at it for over 55 years, and I may be getting the hang of it about now.

I love the patina, the grain, the edge sharpness, and the built-in softness of film imagery. I continue to shoot images with film because of the connection to a medium that is not automatic, ehhanced, or easily reproduced. I also shoot tin type, Palladium, and directly on to paper with my Deardorff 8x10. These processes slow the work, and create one-of-a-kind work that feels differentl than the easily cloned digital image.

Expand full comment
Mike Graziano's avatar

I never stopped shooting film since I started around 2001 when I was 12 or so - and to show for it I have an archive of my friends and family growing up. Memories locked away in negatives that haven't been lost to a bad hard drive or compressed to death on a facebook photo album. To be able to revisit my negatives, to enlarge them, rescan them, to hold them as this indelicate physical object means a lot. Digital can be beautiful and is super useful - but it’s not for the moments that matter to me.

Expand full comment
32 more comments...

No posts